彩神彩票官网平台_平台推荐官方版v2.9.1(2023已更新)

来源：彩神彩票计划群2024-09-24 17:48

文旅部：文化和旅游行业8项疫情防控工作指南即日起废止******

　　中新网1月11日电据文旅部网站消息，文化和旅游部办公厅11日发布关于落实新型冠状病毒感染“乙类乙管”做好文化和旅游行业疫情防控工作的通知(以下简称通知)。通知指出，自本通知印发之日起，文化和旅游行业8项疫情防控工作指南同时废止。

　　通知要求，准确把握“乙类乙管”总体方案精神。3年来，文化和旅游行业认真贯彻落实党中央、国务院决策部署，因时因势优化调整行业疫情防控政策，统筹疫情防控和行业恢复发展取得积极成果。

　　当前，随着病毒变异、疫情变化、疫苗接种普及和防控经验积累，我国新型冠状病毒感染疫情防控工作进入新阶段，面临新形势新任务。各地文化和旅游行政部门要进一步提高政治站位，坚持人民至上、生命至上，坚持科学防治、精准施策，坚持常态化防控和疫情严重期间应急处置相结合，平稳有序实施新型冠状病毒感染“乙类乙管”后的防控政策，统筹疫情防控和行业发展。

　　通知明确，认真落实“乙类乙管”总体方案要求。新冠病毒感染实施“乙类乙管”后，工作重心从“防感染”转到“保健康、防重症”，从风险地区和人员管控转到健康服务与管理。实施“乙类乙管”，不是放开不管，而是强调更加科学、精准、高效做好疫情防控，更好统筹疫情防控与经济社会发展。

　　各地文化和旅游行政部门要结合当地实际，制定实施“乙类乙管”后行业疫情防控措施和疫情严重时的防控措施，确保各项疫情防控要求落实到位，保障文化和旅游活动正常开展，人员有序流动。要指导公共文化单位、文化和旅游经营单位做好场所、活动的常态化疫情防控，科学佩戴口罩，做好清洁消毒和通风换气，降低病毒传播风险。疫情严重期间，可适时依法采取临时性的防控措施，及时应对、果断干预、科学处置。

　　通知指出，扎实做好宣传引导和人员健康管理。各地文化和旅游行政部门要加强对优化调整政策的解读，引导全行业客观认识我国防控政策措施优化调整的科学性和必要性，筑牢群防群控基础。充分发挥传统媒体和网站、微信、客户端等互联网平台的作用，全方位、多渠道开展新型冠状病毒感染防控知识宣传引导。

　　强调“每个人都是自己健康的第一责任人”，引导工作人员、参与文化和旅游活动人员自觉遵守防疫有关规定，坚持勤洗手、戴口罩等良好卫生习惯。开展工作人员培训，提高疫情防控意识和服务水平。提醒参与文化和旅游活动人员关注自身健康状况，做好个人防护。

　　通知称，切实加强组织领导。各地文化和旅游行政部门要强化责任担当，组织落实好“乙类乙管”各项疫情防控措施，科学精准做好疫情防控工作。要加强对公共文化单位、文化和旅游经营单位的指导，明确工作目标，细化工作要求。要开展督导检查，及时发现问题并督促整改，确保各项疫情防控措施落实到位。公共文化单位、文化和旅游经营单位要认真落实疫情防控主体责任，执行实施“乙类乙管”后行业疫情防控措施，推动各项工作有序开展。

　　通知还表示，自本通知印发之日起，文化和旅游行业8项疫情防控工作指南同时废止。

　　附：文化和旅游行业疫情防控工作指南废止目录

　　一、旅行社新冠肺炎疫情防控工作指南(第六版)

　　二、娱乐场所新冠肺炎疫情防控工作指南(第六版)

　　三、剧院等演出场所新冠肺炎疫情防控工作指南(第七版)

　　四、互联网上网服务营业场所新冠肺炎疫情防控工作指南(第六版)

　　五、剧本娱乐经营场所新冠肺炎疫情防控工作指南(第三版)

　　六、旅游景区疫情防控措施指南(2022年12月修订版)

　　七、公共图书馆、文化馆(站)疫情防控措施指南(2022年12月版)

　　八、社会艺术水平考级现场考级活动疫情防控措施指南(2022年11月修订版)

彩神彩票官网平台

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.